论测谎结论的证据效力.doc

  • 需要金币500 个金币
  • 资料包括:完整论文
  • 转换比率:金钱 X 10=金币数量, 即1元=10金币
  • 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)
  • 更新时间:2014-04-26
  • 论文字数:11145
  • 当前位置论文阅览室 > 原创论文 > 法律论文 >
  • 课题来源:(soso)提供原创文章

支付并下载

内容摘要:测谎技术和测谎活动已经在世界范围内被广泛认可和应用。自80年代起测谎技术就在我国侦查活动中得到广泛应用,发挥了侦查导向、查找线索、提高破案率等巨大作用。但是测谎结论的法律地位问题却一直没有得到解决,理论界争论不已,而且现有司法解释的规定也存在问题。在我国,应以与时俱进的态度看待测谎结论,在了解测谎技术科学性的基础上,将测谎结论设定为鉴定结论形式中的有限采用辅助证据,从而更好地为司法实践提供帮助。

关键词:测谎技术  测谎结论  有限采用

 

Abstract: Polygraph technology and polygraphic activities have been widely recognized and used around the world. China also has applied this technology into investigation activities widely since the 1980s. It has played an important role in investigation orientation, seeking clues and improving the detection rate. However, the legal status of Polygraph has not been resolved and theorists have argued it incessantly. Besides, the provision of the existing judicial interpretation is also problematic. In our country, we should treat the polygraph conclusions in a developmental attitude. With more understanding of the scientificalness of polygraph technology, we take polygraph conclusions as the limited used and auxiliary evidence in appraisal conclusion form, so as to better help for judicial practice.

Key words: Polygraph Technology     Polygraph Conclusion    Limited Use